Skip to content

St. John's, Newfoundland.

Engineering casebook

Case 12 / Civil aircraft performance

Honda HA420 analytical performance study

An aircraft-performance calculation study, with original report plots and an interactive example of drag, thrust margin and ideal climb potential.

Original report plots · interactive drag / power model
Aircraft design & performanceFlight dynamicsMATLAB/Simulink
My work

Analytical aircraft-performance study

The engineering question

How do speed and density move the balance between drag demand and available thrust?

I analysed takeoff, climb and cruise performance using an analytical aircraft model. The interactive explorer shows how airspeed and density affect parasite drag, induced drag, thrust margin and ideal climb potential. The accompanying figures document the wider performance calculations.

Inside the method

Method and workflow

  1. 01

    Declare the model

    State weight, reference area, drag assumptions and the source density/thrust-lapse relation.

  2. 02

    Balance lift

    Calculate required lift coefficient at each speed under a steady, level-flight assumption.

  3. 03

    Resolve drag

    Separate the model’s parasite and induced contributions and compare their sum with available thrust.

  4. 04

    Interpret excess power

    Use the thrust margin and speed to inspect ideal climb potential, while exposing the chosen lift limit.

Drag and excess-power analysis

Find the thrust margin.

Required lift coefficient0.526CL
Model drag4.29kN
Available thrust12.50kN
Ideal excess-power climb22.41m/s

Required lift is within the chosen CL ≤ 1.1 assumption.

Drag components and model thrustkN
0.003.446.8710.3113.75Total drag: 130.00, 4.29Available thrust: 130.00, 12.50Parasite drag: 130.00, 2.04Induced drag: 130.00, 2.2660.00140.00220.00True airspeed (m/s)
Total dragAvailable thrustParasite dragInduced drag
Required lift coefficientCL
0.000.681.362.042.72Required CL: 130.00, 0.53Chosen limit: 130.00, 1.1060.00140.00220.00True airspeed (m/s)
Required CLChosen limit

Model parameters: weight 10,701 lbf, area 176.56 ft², span 39.76 ft and 27° wing sweep. CD₀ = 0.0225, k = 0.0902. Thrust varies with density ratio raised to the power 0.6. The curves show the analytical model under these assumptions; aircraft operating limits require separate reference data.

Project figures / 4 selected figures

Project figures

01 / 04
Takeoff analysis
Takeoff analysis
Takeoff analysis

Analytical takeoff calculation showing the effect of aircraft mass under the study conditions.

Open full-size image ↗
Technical notes

Model assumptions and scope

  • The calculations use an analytical model with stated geometry, drag and propulsion assumptions.
  • The explorer uses the climb model’s 27° sweep assumption consistently.
  • Excess-power climb is an ideal estimate. Engine transients, acceleration and detailed operating limits are outside the model, and the lift limit is assumed.
Potential extensions

Verify the aircraft inputs against consistent reference conditions and compare the analytical predictions with appropriately sourced performance data.

Have a related problem?

Let’s work through it.

Robotics, simulation and control consultation across Canada, with remote support available internationally. Share your system and the result you need.

Request consultation
Next case / Flight-data reductionSAAB 340B drag-polar analysis